Maldivian journalist and blogger Ismail ‘Hilath’ Rasheed last week
spoke at the United Nation’s Palace of Nations during the 21
st session of the Human Rights Council (HRC).
In a side event dedicated to the Maldives, Hilath spoke of his fears
of rising fundamentalism in his home country and called for the
international community to keep a close watch on the Maldives to ensure
the protection of human rights and democratic freedoms.
“Maldives may be a small country but it is not insignificant. It lies
at a strategic crossroads and the cultural and political invasion of
Maldives by Saudi-funded Wahhabi extremism will definitely have regional
and global repercussions,” said Hilath.
Hilath was forced to flee the Maldives earlier this year after an
assassination attempt left him within millimetres of death when a group of men slashed his throat just yards from his home in Male’.
Hilath later attributed the assassination attempt to Islamic radicals who had
threatened his life on numerous previous occasions.
Both organisations called for an immediate investigation into the
attack, the latter criticising the authorities for failing to adequately
investigate the incident.
“Until 2003, for the past 800 years, the Maldives had been a moderate
and liberal Islamic country,” said Hilath, whose speech is also
available on his blog which has been
blocked by the authorities since November.
“However, in the last years of [Maumoon Abdul] Gayoom, due to poverty
and oppression, and also as a result of the forced imposition on the
Maldivian people of Gayoom’s own version of Islam, extremism took a
hold, and though it is still a minority, it is a very vocal and
formidable one that both [Mohamed] Nasheed’s and [Mohamed] Waheed’s
governments have been unable to tackle,” he continued.
“But a stark difference has been that while Nasheed’s government
officially acknowledged there was an extremist problem in Maldives,
Waheed is refusing to acknowledge the problem. While Nasheed sought to
keep extremism in check by bringing them into his government, in the
form of the Adhaalath Party, Waheed came into power on the back of
extremism, and therefore is giving free reign to extremists,” said
Hilath.
Prior to this year’s transfer of presidential power, Hilath suffered a
fractured skull after an attack during a silent protest in support of
religious tolerance last December.
He was later arrested in relation to the protest after the
religiously conservative Adhaalath Party (AP) wrote a letter to the
police.
This prompted
Amnesty International to declare him a prisoner of conscience and to demand his immediate release.
The 2008 constitution defines the Maldives as a one hundred percent
Sunni Islamic nation and makes observance of the faith a prerequisite of
citizenship.
“What is worrying is that while Nasheed allowed extremists to spread
their propaganda through private channels, Waheed’s government is
directly sanctioning the promotion of the extremist agenda through
official religious channels,” said Hilath.
“The Adhaalath Party, under whom extremists operate, and under whose
umbrella the Islamic Affairs Ministry has been under both Nasheed and
Waheed, is now using Friday prayer sermons, also known as khuthubas, to spew bigotry, mysogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, racism, sexism and other sorts of discrimination, and to issue fatwas or religious rulings proclaiming the arts and humanities, such as photography, art, music, singing, dancing and acting as haram or sinful,” he added.
Two days after Hilath’s speech in Geneva, the Islamic Ministry
distributed a circular calling for the banning of mixed gender dancing.
This news put the Maldives in the global media spotlight for the
second time this month after the sentencing of a 16 year old girl to
100 lashes for fornication – in accordance with Islamic Sharia – had already made international headlines.
Last Friday also saw a gathering of religious protesters outside of
the United Nations (UN) building to register their anger at the
anti-Islamic film “Innocence of Muslims”.
Protesters burned the American flag and waved banners, one of which read “Maldives: Future graveyard of Americans and Jews”.
Repeated chants were heard urging President Waheed to return
America’s US$20,000 contribution to restore the historical Buddhist artifacts in the museum, which were
destroyed by a mob of vandals during February’s political turmoil.
Some protesters stated that if the idols were restored, they would promptly destroy them again.
In response to the issue of dancing, President’s spokesperson Abbas Adil Riza told the
Associated Free Press (AFP) this week that the circular was not legally enforceable and that the Maldives would always be “a very tolerant society”.
“It is deeply regrettable that both Nasheed and Waheed have done
little or nothing to curb extremism as every political party in Maldives
seems afraid of extremists,” said Hilath.
“What is really depressing now is that since Waheed’s government is
backed by Islamic extremists, who in turn have been backed by rogue
police and military officers, extremists are now acting with impunity,”
he added.
“The only hope we have in saving the Maldives is by the international
community keeping a close watch. I, therefore, welcome UN Human Rights
Commissioner Ms. Navi Pillay’s decision to assign a Human Rights Advisor
to the Maldives as rising Islamic extremism is causing serious setbacks
to human rights, freedom of expression and democracy in the Maldives,”
he said.