Pedophilia of any hue, be it heterosexual,
homosexual or incestuous, is a heinous crime that must be condemned in
the strongest words and punished with the harshest penalties. There is
no dearth of any of these varieties of sexual abuse of children in the
Maldives. However, the homosexual variety appears to be singled out for
public outrage.
Currently there are fast expanding Face
Book groups calling for imposing the death penalty on one Mr. Hussein
Fazeel, who is under investigation for homosexual child abuse. However,
when some months back, a former official of a prestigious government
office was exposed after he allegedly had sexual intercourse with his
own daughter for several years, the Face Book groups were missing.
After being the topic of gossip for a few weeks, the public appears to
have forgotten the whole affair. Why this difference?
Is
there any moral or religious reasons for this difference. Even though I
am not a religious expert, I don't see any reason why incest with one's
daughter is a lesser sin compared with homosexual child abuse.
Fornication is punishable with Hadd and according to some scholars
stoning to death, whereas no such punishment is prescribed in Islam for
sodomy.
Over the years, the label of homosexuality was used as
a tool against political opponents. Historically the most famous
incident involved the ouster and banishment of King Mohamed Shamsuddin
and his heir Prince Hassan Izzuddin to Fuahmulaku. In the letter
accompanying them, Fuahmulaku officials were instructed to strictly
prevent islanders from visiting the duo, because they were supposed to
practice lucid acts. Interestingly, the coup and the propaganda were
engineered by Prime Minister Abdul Majeed and his family. What history
records of their sexual orientation leads one to believe that the whole
affair was a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
In
later years, homosexuality among high officials appears to be tolerated
as long as they had the right political connections. In the last 30
years despite rumors of some powerful leaders being gay, they faced no
consequences. Thus it appears that the public attitude towards
homosexuality is shaped more by politics and homophobia than moral and
religious reasons.
0 comments:
Post a Comment