Friday, December 23, 2011

Workplace HIV/AIDS education session for Maldives Ports Limited, 2011

NARRATIVE REPORT

This workshop was conducted to assess needs of the Maldivian workplace in regard to HIV/AIDS and convey the societal significance of HIV/AIDS in the workplace as part of the company policy for the benefit of both employers and their employees.

Since its inception, in 1988, the Society for Health Education (SHE) continues to explore options and means to enhance the quality of life of Maldivian families. The organization reaffirms its commitment to sustain these initiatives, and to further increasing public awareness on issues that influence family well-being. Effectiveness of health promotion initiatives will be ensured by adopting applicable service delivery mechanisms, fostering improvements in reproductive health parameters, continuing Thalassaemia prevention activities, promoting responsible parenthood concepts, facilitating empowerment of women and youth, supporting victims of abuse, extending counseling to adolescent and families, and encouraging community ownership of development. The organization currently comprise of 27 employees.

The session spanned for a little over 2 hours and included fundamental information on STIs and HIV/AIDS, a comprehensive of needs assessments, open discussions and importance of HIV/AIDS programs in the Maldives and in the workplace.

DEVELOPING THE WORKSHOP:

The workplace was planned by SHE’s Global Fund team. Supplies and materials were prepared. The facilitator for the session was Ms. Hawwa Afrau from SHE counseling department. The session was held at MPL training hall.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SESSION:

The session was initiated by asking questions from the group to evaluate how much knowledge the employees had before the session began. To increase the interaction amongst the participants and to further enhance the understanding of how HIV and other STI could be transmitted from one person to another, a transmission game was conducted.

Next, a short presentation of the HIV/AIDS was given which mainly highlighted on the following:
  • What is HIV/AIDS?
  • Window Period
  • Modes of transmission
  • Preventive measures
  • Myths & Misconceptions regarding HIV/AIDS
The participants made many inquiries, specially on the transmission of HIV from a mother to a baby and the effectiveness of condom as a preventive method. The finding of the Biological and Behavioral Survey (BBS) conducted in the year 2008 was also shared with the participants.

Afterwards, a session on Sexually Transmitted Infections was conducted. Participants were given information on the most commonly found STI’s in Maldives and around the world. Individual signs and symptoms of the infections were explained as well as the preventive measures to be taken.

The discussion then leads off to the importance of partner treatment as well as the “General Rights and Responsibilities of Employee and Employers” and “Universal Precautions “drawing from the “ILO code of practice on HIV/AIDS and the World of Work”.

During the end of the workshop, condom demonstration was provided to employees.

EVALUATION OF THE SESSION:

The session ends on the note of the participants discussing the benefits of the workshop and the importance of such sessions within the workplace given that the Maldives has recently become a signatory to the ILO regulations.

Achievements:
  • A total of 38 employees participated in the session.
  • Participants took part enthusiastically throughout the whole workshop.
  • The facilitators and the participants all enjoyed the workshop.
  • The participants highlighted gained knowledge at the end and acknowledged the importance of workplace policies to safeguard worker rights.

FINANCIAL REPORT

No Detail
Allocated Budget in APB 2011 (MRF)
Estimated Budget (MRF)
Actual (MRF)
Variance (MRF)
Reasons for Variance

SHE
IPPF
GF


1 Training material cost/Stationery
2,550.00
1,000.00
00.00
00.00
650.00
350.00

2 Hall rent
5,100.00
3,800.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
3800.00

3 Refreshment
9,562.50
2,000.00
00.00
00.00
2,000.00
00.00

4 Transportation
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
25.00
-25.00


TOTAL
17,212.50
6,800.00
00.00
00.00
2,675.00
4,125.00


Out-reach Activities via SHE

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Amnesty declares imprisoned blogger a prisoner of conscience

Amnesty International has declared imprisoned blogger Ismail ‘Khilath’ Rasheed a prisoner of conscience, and called for his “immediate and unconditional” release.

The controversial blogger was arrested on December 14 following his participation in a ‘silent protest’ on Human Rights Day, calling for religious tolerance in the Maldives.

A group of men attacked the protesters with stones, and Rasheed was taken to Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital (IGMH) with a fractured skull. He was subsequently arrested for questioning over his involvement in the silent gathering, and the Criminal Court granted police a 10 day extension of detention for the investigation.

“The continued detention of Ismail ‘Khilath’ Rasheed is in breach of international treaties on freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the Maldives is a state party,” Amnesty said in a statement.

“Amnesty International is dismayed that instead of defending Ismail ‘Khilath’ Rasheed, who has peacefully exercised his right to freedom of the expression, the government of Maldives has detained him. Moreover, the government has taken no action to bring to justice those who attacked the ‘silent’ demonstrators, even though there is credible photographic evidence of the attack.”

The attack on Rasheed and his subsequent detention was a “clear example of the erosion of freedom of expression in the Maldives,” Amnesty stated.

“This basic human right is not just under attack from some religious groups; it is also violated by the government of the Maldives. All people in the Maldives should be able to enjoy their right to freedom of expression without being attacked or detained by the police.”

President Mohamed Nasheed was himself declared an Amnesty prisoner of conscience in 1991, following his repeated and prolonged incarceration by the former government.

A photo of Rasheed's alleged attacker taken by the protesters
Journalist detained

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has also called for Rasheed’s immediate release.
“All he did was start a debate about the issues of religious freedom and tolerance in Maldives,” RSF stated.

“The authorities must explain the reasons for his arbitrary detention and release him at once. It is disturbing to see the government yet again yielding to pressure from the most conservative fringes of Maldivian society.”

Rasheed was one of the country’s leading free speech advocates and one of the few Maldivians bloggers to write under his own name, RSF observed.

“The Maldivian constitution bans the promotion of any religion other than Islam but guarantees freedom of assembly and expression as long as it does not contravene Islam. Rasheed professes to be an adherent of Sufism, which emphasises the inner, spiritual dimension of Islam.”

Reaction

President Mohamed Nasheed’s Press Secretary, Mohamed Zuhair, told Minivan News that Hilath had been arrested under an existing regulation passed by parliament that had no bearing on the [executive] government.

“The government’s policy is to allow freedom of expression to the greatest extent possible under the Constitution,” he said.

Under new regulations published by the government in September, interpreting the 1995 Religious Unity Act passed by parliament, media is “banned from producing or publicising programs, talking about or disseminating audio that humiliates Allah or his prophets or the holy Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet (Mohamed) or the Islamic faith.”

Violation of the Act carries a prison sentence of between 2-5 years, and the Communications Authority of Maldives (CAM) in November blocked access to Rasheed’s blog on orders from the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, on the grounds that it contained anti-Islamic material.

Rasheed was arrested amid growing religious and political tensions in the Maldives in the lead up to a ‘Defend Islam’ protest to be held on Friday, December 23.

The protest follows several incidents of religious intolerance in the past few months, including as vandalism of the ‘idolatrous’ SAARC monuments in Addu Atoll and hostility towards calls by the UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay for a moratorium and debate on the flogging of women for extramarital sex.

The December 23 protest is being organised by a coalition of religious NGOs and opposition political parties, who have attacked the government for decisions such as its diplomatic relationship with Israel.
“The government is saying that the Maldives has had an unbroken Islamic tradition for 800 years, and 90 consecutive Chief Justices who have applied Sharia Law,” Zuhair said.

“The President is asking everyone to take a stand tomorrow on the 23rd for the continuation of the Maldives’ moderate Islamic tradition,” he said.

It was “not accurate” to suggest that the government was yielding to fundamentalist fringe elements, he insisted.

“This is political. [Former President] Maumoon Abdul Gayoom and his cronies are testing their support base. The people who are funding this so-called Islamic gathering are the same people selling pork and alcohol.”

By JJ Robinson | December 22nd, 2011 | via Minivan News

Monday, December 12, 2011

Maldives must “better assist those who live under repressive regimes”: Ambassador to the EU tells ‘Freedom Online’ conference

Maldives must “better assist those who live under repressive regimes”: Ambassador to the EU tells ‘Freedom Online’ conference thumbnail
Maldives Ambassador to Belgium and the European Union, Ali Hussain Didi, has attended the Freedom Online Conference at The Hague, Netherlands.

Representatives from Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, Estonia, Ghana, Indonesia, the Republic of Ireland, Kenya, Mexico, Mongolia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Sweden, the European Commission, UNDP, NGO’s, cyber activists and internet companies attended the event.

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton delivered a keynote speech at the opening session of the conference, hosted by Google and Free Press Unlimited.

“This is an urgent task. It is most urgent, of course, for those around the world whose words are now censored, who are imprisoned because of what they or others have written online, who are blocked from accessing entire categories of internet content, or who are being tracked by governments seeking to keep them from connecting with one another,” Clinton said.

Ambassador Didi spoke on behalf of Maldives Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ahmed Naseem, stating that “it is up to us as representatives of the international community to step up our efforts to remind all governments of their responsibilities, under international law, to protect human rights on-line.”

At the same time, the Communications Authority of the Maldives (CAM) last month blocked the website of controversial Maldivian blogger Ismail ‘Hilath’ Rasheed on the order of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs. The Ministry made the request on the grounds that the site contained anti-Islamic material.

CAM Director Abdulla Nafeeg Pasha told Minivan News in November that the Islamic Ministry had the power to regulate website content in the Maldives.

“If the ministry tells us to shut it down, that’s what we do. We do not make the decision,” Pasha said.
Reporters Without Borders (RSF) subsequently issued a statement urging the government “not to give in to the fanatical minority” and to do “all it can to ensure the media are free to tackle any subjects they choose.”

“The increase in acts of religious intolerance is a threat to the Maldives’ young democracy”, RSF said, requesting the “immediate reopening of [Hilath’s] blog.”

RSF noted that there were harsh penalties for blasphemy under Maldivian law following new regulations enforcing the 1994 Religious Unity Act, which bans the media from circulating any material that “humiliates Allah, his prophets, the Koran, the Sunnah or the Islamic faith”.

Incidents involving media workers were rare in the Maldives, RSF observed, “but that is only because most of them prefer to censor themselves and stay away from subjects relating to Islam, unlike Ismail Khilath Rasheed.”

Speaking at the Freedom Online Conference, Ambassador Didi stated that “it is also beholden on us to better assist those who live under repressive regimes and who are trying to use the internet to spread the word about their plight, to mobilise support and to engender change.”

Rasheed was hospitalised with head injuries on Saturday after a ‘silent protest’ against religious intolerance was attacked by a group on men armed with stones.

By JJ Robinson | December 12th, 2011 |  via Minivan News

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Protesters calling for religious tolerance attacked with stones, threatened with death

Police are investigating a violent attack on a ‘silent protest’ calling for religious tolerance, held at the Artificial Beach to mark Human Rights Day.

Witnesses said a group of men threw rocks at the 15-30 demonstrators, calling out threats and vowing to kill them.

One witness who took photos of the attacked said he was “threatened with death if these pictures were leaked. He said we should never been seen in the streets or we will be sorry.”

Among those injured in the attack was Ismail ‘Khilath’ Rasheed, a controverisal blogger whose website was recently blocked by the Communications Authority of the Maldives (CAM) on the order of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs.

Rasheed suffered a head injury and was rushed to Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital (IGMH).

“They started hitting us with bricks. They were aiming at our heads – we could tell they were serious and wanted to kill us,” Rasheed told Minivan News from hospital. “I was taken on a motorcycle to IGMH, but I could see them behind me still hitting my friends.”

Police Sub-Inspector Ahmed Shiyam said police attended the scene after the attackers had departed, and were currently investigating the cause of the violence. No arrests had yet been made, he added.

The protesters, calling themselves ‘Silent Solidarity’, had earlier issued a press release stating that their intention was to “make the Maldives and the international community aware of the rising religious intolerance in the Maldives, and to condemn the Constitutionally endorsed suppression of religious freedom. We also denounce the increasing use being made of Islam as a tool of political power.”

“Silent Solidarity will be protesting against discrimination of all races, gender, sexual preferences and religious beliefs and supporting freedom of thought and expression. In our silence, we speak volumes,” the group’s statement said.

The Maldives has come under increasing international scrutiny following an apparent rise in religious intolerance.

Several monuments gifted to the Maldives by other SAARC countries during the recent summit in Addu have been defaced or stolen on the grounds that they are idolatrous. Islamic Minister Dr Abdul Majeed Abdul Bari has condemned the monuments while the opposition has hailed the vandals as “national heroes”.

Protests also erupted last month after UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay spoke in parliament calling for the government and the judiciary to issue a moratorium and debate on flogging as a punishment for extra-marital sex.

“This practice constitutes one of the most inhumane and degrading forms of violence against women and should have no place in the legal framework of a democratic country,” Pillay said.
“The issue needs to be examined, and therefore I called for a countrywide discussion. It is much better if the issue is transparent and debated.”

Pillay also stated that requirement under the Maldivian constitution that all Maldivians be Muslim ”is discriminatory, and does not comply with international standards. I would urge a debate again on the issue to open up entrance of the constitution to all.”

Challenged by a local journalist that the Maldives was both obliged to protect the religion of Islam, she replied: “You have a constitution which conforms in many respects to universal human rights. Let me assure you that these human rights conform with Islam.”

She added that the Maldives had signed international treaties that are legally-binding obligations, “and such a practice conflicts with these obligations undertaken by the Maldives.”

The following day protesters gathered outside the UN building, carrying placards stating “Islam is not a toy”, “Ban UN” and “Flog Pillay”, and called on authorities to arrest the UN High Commissioner.
MPs roundly condemned Pillay’s statements.

‘”What we should be worried about holding discussions against the fundamentals of Islam in a 100 percent Muslim country such as the Maldives is that we may start questioning about worshipping God Almighty tomorrow,” said opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) MP Dr Afrashim Ali.

Ruling Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) MP Mohamed ‘Colonel’ Nasheed said the Maldives “will never ever open doors for religions other than Islam in the Maldives. We’ll not give the opportunity to speak against the fundamentals and principles of Islam in the parliament.”

MP Riyaz Rasheed, from the opposition-aligen Dhivehi Qaumee Party (DQP) condemned the Speaker Abdulla Shahid from allowing Pillay to complete her address.

“There is a good chance for us to directly say that Abdulla Shahid has made a good deal with this government to wipe out the religion of Islam from this country,” MP Rasheed said.

President Mohamed Nasheed has meanwhile said that Maldivians “should have the self-belief and resolve not to have our faith shaken by listening to statements or opinions expressed by others.”

“That the punishments and rulings of Islamic Sharia are not inhumane is very clear to us,” Nasheed said. “We have the opportunity to show the whole world how noble and civilised Sharia is. That is because we are the only Islamic nation with a democratically-elected government.

“Wasting that opportunity in a Jihadi spirit” with the claim of “defending Islam” was unacceptable, Nasheed said. “Opposition parties will always attack us by using religion as a weapon. [But] I believe that this country is the only Islamic nation where Islamic Sharia has been practiced uninterrupted for 700 years.”

Religious sentiment in the Maldives can often be vocal and heated, but has rarely led to physical violence.

In late May 2010, well-known Islamic preacher Dr Zakir Naik visited the Maldives and delivered a sermon in the capital Male’. During a question-and-answer session 37 year-old Mohamed Nazim stood up and declared himself “Maldivian and not a Muslim”.

Nazim’s declaration angered the 11,000 strong crowd, and he was escorted from the venue by police and officials from the Ministry of Islamic Affairs amid calls for his execution.

After two days of religious counselling in police custody, Nazim appeared before television cameras at an Islamic Ministry press conference and gave Shahada – the Muslim testimony of belief – and apologised for causing “agony for the Maldivian people” and requested that the community accept him back into society.

In July 2010, 25 year-old air traffic controller Ismail Mohamed Didi was found hanged from the control tower of Male’ International Airport in an apparent suicide, after seeking asylum in the UK for fear of persecution over his stated lack of religious belief.

“Maldivians are proud of their religious homogeneity and I am learning the hard way that there is no place for non-Muslim Maldivians in this society,” Didi wrote in a letter to an international humanitarian organisation, prior to his death.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Maldives among the most corrupt nations

Ali Nafiz | Haveeru Online | Dec 03

The Maldives remained among the most corrupt countries in the world with a 2.5 score in Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), according to the 2011 CPI report published by Transparency International.

The country, which received a 143 ranking last year, is ranked 134th alongside Cameroon, Eritrea, Guyana, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan and Sierra Leone.

The Maldives' score, however, was a slight improvement to last year's 2.3 on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 10 (very clean).

In a statement, Transparency Maldives said the poor performance shows the failure of state bodies in combating the widespread corruption in the Maldives.

The Maldives along with Pakistan received the third lowest score among the South Asian countries with Bhutan (5.7) having the least perceived corruption in the region. The state of corruption in Nepal (2.2) and Afghanistan (1.5) is worse than the Maldives.

North Korea, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Myanmar ranked last in the index while New Zealand, Denmark, and Finland are listed as having the least perceived corruption.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Religious NGOs to hold “protest to protect Islam” on December 23


A coalition of religious NGOs have claimed that 100,000 people will join a protest in December “to protect Islam”, and called on “all Maldivians to take part”.

Speaking to the press at the Maldives National Broadcasting Corporation (MNBC) studio, President of the NGO Coalition Mohamed Didi said that more than 127 local NGOs, music clubs, political parties and Island Councils would take part in the protest on December 23.

According to MNBC, Didi said the protest was not a movement against the government but a movement “against all un-Islamic ideas.”

Opposition Dhivehi Rayyithunge Party (DRP) Deputy Leader Ibrahim ‘Mavota’ Shareef warned that “our faith will not be shaken by something someone says, but because of these things it might turn the non-muslims living in neighboring countries against us.’’

MNBC reported that the People’s Alliance Party (PA) had called on parents to bring children to the gathering.

Local newspaper Sun quoted Didi as saying that the government had been conducting many activities with the motive of erasing Islam from the country, and claimed that the NGO coalition was “left with no other choice but to protest to protect Islam.”

Senior officials from the Adhaalath Party, Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM), Dhivehi Qaumee Party (DQP) and Jumhoree Party (JP) were present at today’s meeting.

Claims that national monuments placed in Addu for the SAARC Summit were idolatrous and hostility towards a call by UN Human Rights Ambassador Navi Pillay for a national debate on flogging sparked protests in Male’ recently.

“This practice constitutes one of the most inhumane and degrading forms of violence against women, and should have no place in the legal framework of a democratic country,” Pillay said, referring to the practice of flogging a punishment for fornication.

Press Secretary for the President Mohamed Zuhair did not respond to Minivan News at time of press.

SE Asia should focus on keeping kids HIV-free: WHO

HIV/AIDS is shifting profile from a “life-threatening emergency to a manageable chronic disease,” finds an annual report on the Global Response to HIV/AIDS.

The report was released in honor of World Aids Day on December 1, 2011 by World Health Organisation (WHO), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) in collaboration with international partners.

The report analyses the health sector’s prevention, treatment and care to those infected in low- and middle- income countries using data through 2010. Among the recommendations for South East Asia was to eliminate childhood infection by 2015.

“We must learn from our experiences, and work to ensure that no child born gets infected with HIV,” Dr Samlee Plianbangchang, WHO Regional Director for South-East Asia, said in a press statement.
As of 2010, 16 million people out of South East Asia’s population of 593 million had been diagnosed with HIV/AIDS. But statistics suggest a synchronized solution. Over the preceding decade infection rates in South-East Asia declined by a sharp 34 percent while the number of people receiving treatment increased ten-fold.

“We are coming out of a transformative decade for the HIV/AIDS epidemic. With innovative treatment regimens, improved health services as well as political commitment, HIV-positive people who are on treatment are living longer and better lives,” Plianbangchang said.

As WHO pushes South-East Asia to eliminate the disease it makes children a priority. Towards that end, an initiative to eliminate new paediatric HIV infections and congential syphilis by that date was launched this year.

Meanwhile, less than one in five pregnant women in the region do not have access to testing facilities, and two out of three infected pregnant women do not receive anti-viral prophylaxis.

Historically the Maldives has been minimally affected by HIV/AIDS, however social trends are putting the population at risk.

Between 1991 and 2006 only 13 HIV cases were reported among Maldivians, compared to 168 among expatriate workers. Of the Maldivian cases 10 were sailors, two were spouses, and one was a resort worker who had traveled abroad; 11 cases were male, and all patients cited heterosexual transmission as the cause.

Yet the country’s geographical constraints have made it highly dependent on foreign imports. This has been shown to include human trafficking for purposes including sexual entertainment. In 2010, an HIV-positive prostitute was arrested locally.

Late last month, human trafficking was reported a growing industry. In 2008, a World Bank report listed mobility, sexual practice, commercial sex work and drug use as leading risk factors. Although HIV is not prevalent within the Maldives, the report claims travel, work and education abroad open opportunities for transmission.

The Maldives also has the world’s highest divorce rate, indicating a high rate of shared partners within the country. Without any formal sexual education in schools and a general stigma around purchasing a condom, the basic defenses against HIV transmission are low.

The report also cites drug use as a risk factor for two reasons. “Drug users may resort to selling sex to earn money, and injecting drug users (IDUs) may share needles/syringes.”

In Awareness, the Maldives scored in the middle-range. While 99 percent of Maldivians polled had heard of HIV/AIDS and 91 percent knew at least one mode of HIV transmission, only 50 percent said condoms can protect against HIV and 34 percent did not know that a healthy looking person can carry the virus.

Currently, the government and independent organisations provide support and awareness within the Maldives. The National AIDS Council, established in 1987, oversees the National AIDS Program (NAP) which coordinates and monitors a multi-sectoral response to the issue.

United Nations’ Development Program (UNDP) is also running a project, active in the Maldives until 2012, with several local NGOs. It aims to support preventative efforts and improve treatment.

Among the conclusions drawn in WHO’s 2011 report on Asia are:
  • Cambodia was the only country to achieve universal ART access
  • 39 percent infected children had access to paediatric HIV treatment
  • 49 percent of people living with HIV are in India
  • Infections among children declined by 23 percent in Asia, but increased by 31 percent in East Asia
  • Asia’s death toll from AIDS-related causes in 2010 was the largest outside sub-Saharan Africa; approximately 310,000 people died
  • Half of the 4.5 million people in Asia who inject drugs live in China
  • Homosexual transmission is highest among men in Indonesia, India and Myanmar
Officials at the Ministry of Health and Family and WHO Maldives were unavailable for comment at time of press.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Intravenous drug use raises AIDS spectre in Maldives

Thirty years since the first reported cases of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in 1981, the response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic has been unprecedented, especially in terms of global and national initiatives.

Substantial progress has been made, such as a 31 percent reduction in the number of new infections between 2001 and 2009 in South-East Asia. A revolutionary new approach to treatment endorsed by UNAIDS and WHO, which includes improved, lower-cost drugs, simplified HIV diagnostic technologies, improved delivery systems, and innovations  in prevention of HIV infection, give hope for achieving universal access to prevention, care and treatment of HIV/AIDS, even in resource-constrained settings.

Yet, the challenge is far from over. HIV still remains a formidable foe, affecting 33.3 million people globally, including 2.5 million children. Despite years of concerted global efforts and investments, there is still neither a cure nor an effective vaccine for the disease.

However, over time, the profile of the HIV epidemic is evolving from a life threatening to a chronic disease, thanks to availability of more effective drugs and efficacious service delivery models involving communities and people living with HIV/AIDS. With changing realities, it is time, then, to reflect and re-strategize in the long-drawn war against HIV/AIDS. Fundamental to success is acknowledging that HIV/AIDS is a social and developmental issue as much as a health one.

The impact on women and children is devastating. An estimated 1.3 million women aged 15 and above currently live with HIV in the WHO’s South-East Asia Region (Bangladesh, Bhutan, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, India, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste).

The estimated number of children living with HIV has increased by 46 percent during 2001 – 2009. Of the 448 million cases of sexually transmitted infections that occur globally, 71 million are in South-East Asia. Due to low coverage of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programme in the South-East Asia Region, a large number of babies born to HIV-positive mothers acquire HIV infection in the womb.

Despite considerable diversity in the HIV epidemic among the countries of the Region, unsafe sex and injecting drug use are the main drivers. Five countries -India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal and Thailand – account for a majority of the disease burden. Sexual transmission accounts for the majority of cases in Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Timor-Leste.  The HIV epidemic among people who inject drugs is significant in Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, Thailand, and some regions of India.

The Maldives has a growing threat of the HIV epidemic due to injecting drug use.

The evolution of the epidemic from life threatening to a chronic disease, with better drugs and better access to drugs, has resulted in prolonging survival and quality of care for people living with HIV/AIDS. This necessitates evolution of an HIV care model that is in line with chronic disease management, with primary care providers playing an important role.

The spectrum of HIV care needs to evolve into a comprehensive primary care model that has an integrated, patient-centered approach, and is linked to specialist care where and when needed. It also needs to address the various socio-cultural issues that take the response beyond the health sector into the families and communities.

Other key challenges include late diagnosis of HIV, stigma and discrimination faced by people with HIV and most-at-risk population; limited capacity of health systems; high prices of antiretroviral drugs especially the second line drugs, and lack of sustained finances.

The health sector can only overcome these challenges if it collaborates with other sectors in order to tackle the social, economic, cultural and environmental issues that shape the epidemic and access to health services.

WHO’s  Health Sector Strategy on HIV for South-East Asia has been endorsed by all the eleven Member States of the Region. It envisions “Zero new HIV infections, zero AIDS-related deaths and zero discrimination in a world where people living with HIV are able to live long, healthy lives.”
The four strategic directions to achieve the goal include: optimising HIV prevention, care and treatment outcomes; strengthening strategic information systems for HIV and research; strengthening health systems to ensure that the expanded response to HIV will build effective, efficient and comprehensive health systems in which HIV and other essential services are available, accessible and affordable; and fostering supportive environment to ensure equitable access to HIV services.

WHO continues to work with countries to achieve universal access to comprehensive HIV prevention, treatment and care and to contribute to health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), particularly MDG 6 (combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases). Together, we hope to move closer to a world free of AIDS.

Dr. Samlee Plianbangchang is the Regional Director of the World Health Organisation for the South-East Asia Region.

By Samlee Plianbangchang | November 28th, 2011 | via Minivan News

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

“Don’t give in to fanatical minority”, Reporters Without Borders urges government

Reporters Without Borders (RSF) have issued a statement urging the government “not to give in to the fanatical minority” and to do “all it can to ensure the media are free to tackle any subjects they choose.”

The statement came in response to the Islamic Ministry’s ordering of the Communications Authority of the Maldives (CAM) to block the website of controversial blogger, Ismail Khilath “Hilath” Rasheed, on the grounds that it contained anti-Islamic material.

“The increase in acts of religious intolerance is a threat to the Maldives’ young democracy”, RSF said its statement, requesting the “immediate reopening of [Hilath’s] blog.”

RSF noted that there were harsh penalties for blasphemy under Maldivian law following new regulations enforcing the 1994 Religious Unity Act, which bans the media from circulating any material that “humiliates Allah, his prophets, the Koran, the Sunnah or the Islamic faith”.

Incidents involving media workers are rare in the Maldives, RSF observed, “but that is only because most of them prefer to censor themselves and stay away from subjects relating to Islam, unlike Ismail Khilath Rasheed.”

“According to Rasheed, the Islamic Affairs Ministry had his blog in its sights because he is a Sufi Muslim, not a Sunni like most Maldivians, and has always been highly critical of religious fundamentalism.”

RSF compiles the annual Press Freedom Index. The Maldives is currently ranked 52nd out of 178 countries.

President Mohamed Nasheed’s Press Secretary, Mohamed Zuhair, acknowledged that the decision would affect the Maldives’ reputation for press freedom.

“The government has a responsibility to protect the tenets of Islam,” Zuhair said, but urged Hilath to appeal the decision: “I believe there should be more dialogue and discussion before action is taken.”
“Blocking a website containing undesirable material is not an option for the Maldivian government. The Internet is larger than 1-2 Maldivian bloggers. Should we shut out all content deemed undesirable by Islamic scholars, and is it even technically possible with filtering?”

Zuhair noted that the Maldives had benefited from having one the highest rates of Internet penetration in the region.

According to Facebook statistics, one third of the Maldives population have accounts on the social network, the vast majority of them aged between 18-35.


Monday, November 21, 2011

Blog crack-down “is just the beginning”, warns censored blogger

The website of controversial Maldivian blogger Ismail ‘Hilath’ Rasheed has been shut down by Communications Authority of the Maldives (CAM) on the order of the Ministry of Islamic Affairs. The Ministry made the request on the grounds that the site contained anti-Islamic material, a CAM statement read.

CAM Director Abdulla Nafeeg Pasha told Minivan News the Islamic Ministry has the power to regulate website content.

Pasha did not wish to comment on the procedures for closing down a website, but said “if the ministry tells us to shut it down, that’s what we do. We do not make the decision.”

Once closed, Pasha explained, a website can only be re-opened by order of the court.
Islamic Minister Abdul Majeed Abdul Bari had not returned calls at time of press, and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry Mohamed Didi had not responded to enquiries.

In a statement issued today Hilath defended his blog as an expression of his Sufi Muslim identity.
“I am a Sufi Muslim and there is nothing on my website that contradicts Sufi Islam. I suspect my website was reported by intolerant Sunni Muslims and Wahhabis,” he claimed.

Under the Maldivian constitution every Maldivian is a Sunni Muslim. The constitution also provides for freedom of expression, with Article 27 reading “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and the freedom to communicate opinions and expression in a manner that is not contrary to any tenet of Islam.”

New regulations published by the government in September, enforcing the 1994 Religious Unity Act, bans the media from producing or publicising programs, talking about or disseminating audio “that humiliates Allah or his prophets or the holy Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet (Mohamed) or the Islamic faith.”

“This also includes the broadcasting of material (on other religions) produced by others and recording of such programs by the local broadcaster, and broadcasting such material by the unilateral decision of the local broadcaster,” the regulations stipulate. Under the Act, the penalty for violation is 2-5 years imprisonment.

Hilath claimed he was being censored for expressing his version of Islam, and called for more freedom of interpretation within the faith.

“I call upon all concerned to amend the clause in the constitution which requires all Maldivians to be Sunni Muslims only,” his statement read.

“‘Unto you your religion and unto me my religion,’ and ‘There is no compulsion in religion’,” he said, quoting Qur’an 109:6 and 2:256.

Hilath believes the block of his website has a political edge. “If Sunni Muslims are the conservatives, then the Sufi Muslims are the liberals,” he told Minivan News. “I think this is a conservative attack on the site. They think if you’re not a Sunni, you’re an unbeliever.”

Hilath said he would approach the issue from its constitutional roots. “If I want to unlock my blog I will have to go to court, where they will say I’m an unbeliever which is illegal. So I will have fight the larger issue of the constitution,” he said.

The label of ‘unbeliever’ was tantamount to ‘enemy of the state’, he said, adding that bloggers such as himself were afraid of the consequences of being labelled as such. Hilath is one of only a few Maldivian bloggers who write under their own names.

In January 2009 the Islamic Ministry shut down several blogs for allegedly publishing anti-Islamic material. The action closely followed then-newly elected President Mohamed Nasheed’s statement that the Maldives would be a haven of free expression.

Hilath said he was ashamed of the government’s maintenance of its original declaration for a liberal democracy. “I know the President said this was a liberal democracy, but I am ashamed that the Islamic Ministry has assumed so much power,” he said. “I call upon the president to address this issue.”

A 2009 review endorsed by UNESCO’s International Programme for the Development of Communication defined freedom of expression in the digital age as dependent on “neutral” networks “in the sense that the flow of content should not be influenced by financial, cultural or political reasons.”

“In particular, in the case of filtering, the origin of filtering lists and the underlying criteria and processes should be publicly available,” read the report.

The report made three recommendations for the Maldives:
1) To stop blocking websites as was done in March 2009;
2) If blocking is necessary, it should only be pursued following a favorable court decision;
3) To foster open discussions on internet regulation among citizens, government members, NGOs and international parties.

To Hilath’s knowledge, this is the first time a websites has been blocked since January 2009. He believes his website is part of a “bigger conservative fight against the [ruling] Maldivian Democratic Party” and is only the beginning of a new wave of censorship.

“This time I think the conservatives behind the Islamic Ministry think they can put pressure on the government to see all these things as anti-Islamic, like with the SAARC monument issue. More blogs will probably be blocked. I think this is just the beginning.”

The opposition to Hilath’s blog “is a minority of the population, but it’s very vocal and active,” he said. By contrast the younger generation, which composes approximately half of the Maldives population, may take a different view, he claimed.

“The younger generation is educated and enlightened about religion and freedom and Islamic principles. I think the majority will support my move. But few feel free to speak out,” he said.
Mohamed Nazeef, President of Maldives Media  Council (MMC), said he was not familiar with the blog in question. However he said that the media – even bloggers – were subject to the society it served.

“Even when you talk about democracy there are ethics, and you have to respect the prevailing culture of the country and the needs of its people. Even in the name of freedom there are boundaries. That’s why we have a media code of ethics.”

When asked whether a citizen’s blog could arguably represent or oppose the greater good, Nazeef explained that a balance between people and the law was important.

“The constitution must be respected because people are under the constitution. Nobody is above the law. If you want to do something that is not allowed you have to properly amend the law.”

Sunday, November 13, 2011

IDLO Co-hosts the First Regional Roundtable Dialogue on HIV and Law in South Asia


Kathmandu, Nepal - In collaboration with the legal apex body for the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARCLAW), UNDP, UNAIDS and the World Bank, IDLO co-hosted a South Asian Regional Roundtable Dialogue on HIV and the Law at the Yak and Yeti Hotel, Kathmandu from 8 - 10 November 2011.

The Roundtable was a direct follow up to the Asia Pacific Regional Dialogue of the Global Commission on HIV and Law convened by the UNDP in February 2011 in Bangkok. It supported commitments to advance human rights to reduce stigma, discrimination and violence related to HIV as well as the region-specific commitments, which were adopted, by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in Resolutions 66/10 and 67/9.

Across the region, people living with HIV and populations at higher risk of exposure to HIV including men who have sex with men, transgender people, sex workers and people who inject drugs; routinely face human rights violations. These violations include police harassment, sexual assault and violence, as well as discrimination, job dismissal, unequal access to education, housing and reduced access to HIV treatment.

The aim of the Roundtable was to identify and analyze strategies and initiatives to address these barriers and strengthen the rights-based response to HIV in their respective countries. Seventy five delegates from seven countries across South Asia including community advocates, lawyers, judges, representatives of human rights institutions, parliamentarians and government agencies gathered in Kathmandu to discuss these issues and develop recommendations.

The Roundtable was opened by a welcome reception and formal address by the Vice President of SAARCLAW, Honourable Justice Kalayan Shrestha of the Supreme Court of Nepal, who emphasized the role of the state in the legal response to HIV, stating "No philosophy, no religion and no culture which reinforces discrimination against and denies human rights to [people living with HIV] is acceptable. The state must defend [people living with HIV]…, complacency of any form on the part of the state is also a form of discrimination".

The President of SAARCLAW, Hon. Chief Justice Sonam Tobyge of Bhutan echoed the importance of the rights of people living with HIV and key populations at higher risk of exposure to HIV, stating "the Roundtable Dialogue symbolizes the universal and eternal message of hope and joy in life to the multitude of [persons]affected by HIV in the region".

Over the following two days, participants discussed the impact of rights violations on key affected populations and shared case studies and best practice examples on how to strengthen the legal environment in South Asia. Participants also discussed how stigma, discrimination and criminalization negatively impact upon access to essential HIV related prevention, treatment, care and support.

The Roundtable concluded with a planning session in which participants worked in country groups to develop recommendations aimed at increasing engagement in national legal responses to HIV. The participants’ recommendations will be included in the Roundtable Report.

At the closing session, Hon Sapana Pradhan Malla, Member of Parliament in Nepal, congratulated delegates for the success of the meeting in her key note address. This was further echoed by one of the participants, Abdul Raheem Khan from Naz Male Health Alliance in Pakistan, who said ‘[the Roundtable] was an intensely motivating and profound learning experience for the entire group’. Another delegate, Midnight Poonkasetwatana, Coordinator of Asia Pacific Coalition on Male Sexual Health (APCOM), also noted: ‘it's been really useful for SAARCLAW and the civil society groups to advocate directly with people who are able to help change the law and policy environment in SAARC countries.’

The results of the Roundtable will be fed into relevant regional and global initiatives including the Global Commission on HIV and the Law and the UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board (29th PCB) and will be shared at the International AIDS Conference 2012.

The Roundtable was supported by the World Bank, UNDP, the Global Fund for AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria, and OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID) the development finance institution of OPEC member states. OFID provides financial support for socioeconomic development, particularly in low-income countries. www.ofid.org UNAIDS and the South Asian Technical Support Facility provided input and technical support for the Roundtable.
Representatives from Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh Bhutan, Maldives participated at the conference.
Source: IDLO
Further Reading: Sunday Observer

Friday, October 28, 2011

Motion of No Confidence Against HRCM

For failing to protect the human rights of citizens, a motion of no confidence against the Human Rights Commission of Maldives (HRCM) is being considered by the MDP Parliamentary Group, said Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) MP Mohamed Mustafa to Minivan News yesterday.

When HRCM was approached regarding the situation of Homosexuality in June 2011, they quoted growing religious extremism as the reason why the Queer community of Maldives was being ignored by them. They have failed to answer e-mails and phone calls since regarding this matter.

“We have noticed that the HRCM members that we appointed have failed to protect the rights of the citizens, and are more concerned about protecting the rights of particular persons”, said MP Mustafa. “I am ashamed of HRCM for they have showed no effort in fulfilling the duty assigned to them.”

He boldly went on to claim that “… there is no use of the current HRCM members and paying money to them is a big waste”. He also called on the resignation of the commission members and said the commission would be “better with empty desks”.

Sex between same-sex adults remains criminalized in the Maldives. According to the Section 15, clause 173 (8a) “Sexual activity with a member of the same sex”, under the “Rules of adjudication”, the punishment is to be lashed (tha’zeer) between 19 to 39 times and banished or imprisoned for a period between 1 to 3 years, taking into account, the severity of the offence.

The consideration of the overdue motion of no confidence against HRCM arrives after a teenage boy was seriously injured and left disabled, and exactly two years after the Islamic Ministry criticises HRCM whilst in an attempt to shift focus from the issue of child concubines in the Maldives by saying that Homosexuality is rampant and being promoted after a letter on Homoesxuality was published on Minivan News in September 2009.

A biological and behavioural survey (BBS) on HIV/AIDS in 2008 in the Maldives revealed the size of the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) was estimated to be between 1,600 – 4,200. 


Via:  i ♥ f k

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Fact Sheet: HIV AIDS as of October 2011

Enhancing the Response to HIV/AIDS in the Maldives

HIV/AIDS Situation

At the end of 31 December 2005, a total of 13 HIV cases among Maldivians, and 168 HIV cases among expatriate workers have been reported. Of the 13 HIV-positive cases reported among Maldivians, 10 were sailors, two were the spouses of these sailors, and one was a resort worker who travelled abroad with a foreign tourist. Eleven HIV cases were male. All infections were acquired through heterosexual route of transmission. Compared to many countries in the region it has a very low prevalence of HIV. The challenge for the Maldives is to ensure it remains a low HIV prevalence country in spite of increasing high risk behaviours among some population groups.

Global Fund Partnership

The Phase II (September 2009 – August 2012) of the Global Fund grant to Maldives totals US $ 2.289million. The grant emphasizes prevention strategies to ensure that Maldives maintains a low prevalence of HIV by primarily targeting those population groups most at risk and creating a supportive environment, to ensure not only support for HIV/AIDS initiatives but also to reduce the stigma and discrimination often facing people who are at risk of contracting HIV/AIDS in the Maldives.

OVERVIEW

In partnership with the Global Fund, UNDP is committed to support the implementation of the National Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS (2007-2011) to create a supportive environment to reduce HIV transmission and HIV-related morbidity, mortality and disability in the Maldives.

Its main components include: 
1.    Prevent HIV transmission among young people; 
2.    Prevent HIV transmission among populations at risk such as migrant, seafarers and resort workers; 
3. Increase awareness and knowledge about STIs (sexually
transmitted infection) / HIV; 
4.    Easy accessibility to quality HIV testing and counselling; 
5.    Strengthen the prevention and control of STIs; 
6. Strengthen health service capacity to provide care and
treatment for HIV/AIDS patients; 
7.    Strengthen health systems capacity for prevention of HIV & other such infections through blood and blood products; 
8.    Strengthen strategic information system for HIV; Strengthen multi sectorial response to HIV/AIDS.

UNDP Support

UNDP acts as the Principle Recipient (PR) for this project. As PR, UNDP is responsible for the financial and programmatic management of the GFATM grant as well as for the procurement of health and non-health products. In all areas of implementation, it provides capacity development services to sub-recipients (SR) and implementing partners.

Sub-recipients

National AIDS Programme, Centre for Community Health and Disease Control (CCHDC), Department of Drug Prevention and Rehabilitation Services (DDPRS) and Family with Journey (NGO) and Society for Health & Education - SHE (NGO) implements the programme activities under the guidance of the Country Coordination Mechanism (CCM)

Contribution to Capacity Development

In order to strengthen the national response to HIV in the Maldives, UNDP has provided consistent support to the government and the civil society organizations to be involved in planning and implementing key activities that impacts HIV response. Programme support staffs from the government and the civil society were trained in the following areas of:
•    Programme Management 
•    Behaviour Change Communication. 
•    procurement supply management 
•    financial management 
•    monitoring and evaluation

Key stakeholders in the mapping of high risk groups UNDP has linked Technical Assistance from the World Bank to conduct the first of its kind in-depth mapping exercise of the Most-at-Risk Populations in the Maldives.

UNDP facilitated the participation of key Policy makers, stakeholders and representatives from the targeted population in the International Conference on AIDS in Asia-Pacific (ICAAP), exposure visits and supported the enhancement of knowledge in programming and implementation of HIV related services for youth    through    stakeholder    consultations.    Training    and sensitization sessions were conducted for the law enforcement officers on Most-at-Risk Populations’ vulnerability to HIV/AIDS and to enhance their knowledge on HIV/AIDS.

Health care personnel were trained Volunteer Counseling and testing, safe blood transfusions; consolidated blood transfusion services and on HIV care needs and ARV and peer group education trainings were conducted on HIV AIDS risks for drug users and Injecting drug users.

UNDP mobilized Technical Assistance for the sub-recipients in the areas of Financial Management, Monitoring and Evaluation and Blood Safety.

Key Achievements

•    UNDP facilitated a joint mid-term review of the National Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS (NSP) 2007-2011 with technical assistance from the World Bank, UNAIDS, WHO, UNICEF, UNODC and the National AIDS Programme of the Ministry of Health.

• A research-based advocacy meeting was held for the parliament members on drug abuse and HIV scenario in the Maldives highlighting the current issues that needs need to be considered when passing the recently drafted Drug Bill.

• As a result of the joint action plan formulated after the ICAAP meeting, the issue of HIV was addressed in the sermons (nation- wide) of two Friday prayers and sessions on HIV and the preventative behaviours within the Islamic context was delivered in seven mosques. A sensitization workshop on HIV was also held for the Islamic scholars in partnership with the Ministry of Islamic Affairs.

• HIV prevention intervention DUs and IDUs held for prisons inmates covering 100% female and 84% of male inmates population in Maafushi Prison (as of March 2009) .

• UN Joint team on HIV/AIDS acquired funding from theUNAIDS Programme Accelerated Funds (PAF) to conduct a Biological and Behavioural Survey in the Prisons of the Maldives.

• National Monitoring & Evaluation Plan on HIV/AIDS developed. 

• Mass Media campaign on HIV Prevention “HIV ah huras alhamaa” was launched targeting high risk groups.

• Interventions for migrants on HIV prevention conducted in five languages (Bengali, Tamil, Nepalese, Singhalese and English). Multilingual outreach programmes initiated and on-going.

• Public private partnerships were established to conduct outreach sensitization of HIV/AIDS workplace education to pave way for formulating a constructive workplace HIV policy.

Looking to the Future

• Strengthening of the Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) systems 
• Implement targeted interventions for the MARPs and vulnerable populations 
• Strengthening the prevention and control of STIs and expand access and coverage of quality HIV testing and counseling 
• Strengthen multi sectorial response to address HIV/AIDS


Source: UNDP Maldives

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Why minorities tend to make more noise

Via Hilath.com | October 8th, 2011

It’s common sense that when you are a minority (like a Maldivian Christian, Wahhabi, atheist, gay, lesbian, etc) your sense of survival will be more heightened especially if the majority of the people are seen as trying to force you to bend to their will by making it a must in the Maldives’ Constitution that all Maldivian Citizens be strictly Sunni Muslims and cannot belong to either other Muslim denominations like Sufism and Shiittism and other religions like Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc.

So Mr. Ibrahim Mohamed could be forgiven for writing this opinion column in Minivan News titled Anwar al-Awalaki’s killing is unjustified, in that Wahhabis have their hopes dashed now because unlike their expectations during the most harsh latter years of Gayoom’s rule, the majority of Maldivians — despite the fear-mongering by Wahhabi extremists like the Salaf of the 2004 tsunami being a “God’s wrath” on Maldives — are still maintaining their moderate stand. 

In fact recently there have been a wave of young Maldivians shaving off their beards while their female counterparts took off their burkas. Wahhabis, especially the intolerant and extremist among them, are now realizing that moderate Muslim Maldivians would only tolerate Wahhabi nonsense as long as such nonsense is not forcibly imposed upon the majority moderate Muslim Maldivians who believe in things like technology, vaccination and empowerment of women.

Hence, Mr. Ibrahim’s attempts at trying to project that the majority of Maldivians support Anwar al-Awlaki is misleading because I personally have yet to come across a rational Maldivian who thinks Mr. Anwar is a hero. 

As I said before on this blog, Maldives needs to have a think tank or a brave enough NGO to conduct polls and surveys because otherwise we would have religious zealots like Mr. Ibrahim making false statements on behalf of the majority of Maldivians when the majority of Maldivians do not endorse the extremist ideology he is promoting. In fact, the whole article, in a nutshell, seems to be Mr. Ibrahim’s covert attempt to project that a majority of Maldivians support Mr. Anwar’s extremist ideology. In various phrases, Mr. Ibrahim tries to project Extremism as the true Islam, which is most unfortunate and tragic, and perhaps would lead to anger among true Muslim Maldivians who wouldn’t want Islam’s name associated with a violence-preaching Hypocrite like Mr. Anwar.

Mr. Ibrahim’s article, and the many commentators that regularly post feedback on Minivan News and Haveeru Online, demonstrate that Maldivians are very much polarized now not just in politics but in religion as well. For instance, on one hand you would have extremist-leaning commentators like Mr. Ibrahim who promotes an ideology in which all non-Wahhabis do not have a right to live, while on the other extreme, radical atheists would equally say harsh things about Islam, just short of calling to kill anyone. 

If Maldivians immediately do not find a way to leave extremism of all sorts behind, and find a way to exist in harmony together, there would be no peace of mind for anyone in this society. We may think that we can continue to be radically opposed to each other, comfortable in the belief that we can afford to do so because this is such a small society where everyone is related to blood and therefore no one can afford to become violent towards another because he will suffer in return from a violent act, but why hide behind this kind of social “deterrence”? Why are we afraid to embrace diversity? Why do we need everyone to have the same belief or religion in order to be friends? Or do Maldivians have a disorder which prevents them from having humanity and acting kind towards other human beings who may happen to believe in a different religion? We need to find answers – and soon!

I’m not here to debate whether it was ethical to kill Mr. Anwar because we would then have to go back hundreds of years of history but I think we can safely assume that the current conflicts in Palestine, Afghanistan, etc are the result of Muslims themselves failing to act responsibly, and worse because moderate Muslims remained silent when a lot of their poverty-stricken brothers began to turn to not only Wahhabism but its most extremist form, the Taliban ideology promoted by al-Qaeda. 

It is also tragic that Mr. Ibrahim claims there is no evidence that Mr. Anwar was a terrorist, because whether the videos were removed from YouTube, we have already seen him engage in what an average moderate Muslim Maldivian will recognize as hate speech and incitement to violence and hatred. Therefore I find it unacceptable that Mr. Ibrahim should paint Mr. Anwar as some kind of Islamic hero because true Muslims would regard Mr. Anwar as a Hypocrite with a blood lust who have to take responsibility for the deaths of many innocent Muslims and non-Muslims. 

I’m sure most Maldivians are intelligent and ethical and need no patronizing from anyone — and would certainly want to dissociate themselves from Mr. Anwar because terror-supporters like Mr. Anwar have been sadly successful in painting Islam in a bad light, the result being that Muslims all over the world are now targeted for hatred because Mr. Anwar’s misguided actions have led many non-Muslims to believe that Islam is a violent religion.

So while I have nothing personal against Mr. Ibrahim, as a fellow Muslim but Sufi brother, I can only pray that he gets sense from his current misguided-ness and try to see the fact that it is this democracy which is even helping a minority Wahhabi like him with extremist views to survive here.
Mr. Ibrahim should understand that other minorities, like non-Muslim Maldivians, like the minority Wahhabis as well, also have a right to survive in this land. Therefore I would greatly appreciate if he also join hands with other minorities and help to strengthen this democracy by supporting freedom of religion which is a right given by the Quran to every human being. 

I can understand why Mr. Ibrahim and other minority Wahhabis may acquire extremist views, because as I said at the beginning of this blogpost, minorities will feel more pressure to survive in a community like Maldives especially when the majority thinks that democracy is suppressing minorities instead of protecting individual rights of every citizen. 

But Wahhabis should also realize that they should control their anger over their grievances which is resulting in them turning to violence — and try not to hijack the government and impose its will on the rest of other Maldivians because only when they themselves adopt a moderate and tolerant attitude will the majority of moderate Muslim Maldivians and other minority Maldivians will let go of their fear of Wahhabis and leave them alone to live in peace as they like. 

As I’ve always said, if Wahhabis prevented themselves from going to extremism and stopped calling for the deaths of non-Muslims, then I am sure minority Wahhabis will have nothing to fear in Maldives and that other non-minorities like radical atheists would also become quiet, and that the reason why minorities like atheists have become as radical as the Wahhabis is because extremist Wahhabis are calling for their deaths. It’s like a hate cycle kept in loop because one party — the Wahhabis — do not want non-Muslims to exist on earth. Now, come on…

That’s why this then makes the majority moderate Muslim Maldivians strange bedfellows of Maldivian minorities because the common enemy seems the extremist version of Wahhabism which will not tolerate the other two groups. That’s why the majority of Maldivians who are moderate Muslims would rather support minorities like non-Muslim Maldivians instead of Wahhabi extremists because everyone knows that if the extremists among Wahhabis come to power, then it will be death for both non-Muslim Maldivians and the majority moderate Muslim Maldivians who so much love simple pleasures of life like the Internet and cable TV.

It is also tragic that Mr. Ibrahim in his article tried to project Jihad as a war that has to be initiated by Muslims against Jews and Christians even if they don’t provoke Muslims. I tend to agree with Ibra who told off Sheikh Fareed, that just because Allah recounted the history of Jews and Christians in the Quran, it does not necessarily mean that Allah is directly commanding modern-day Muslims to take the law into their own hands and carry out a non-discriminate extermination campaign of the People of the Book.

As I said earlier, we need a think tank or a brave enough NGO who can undertake to conduct regular polls and surveys about contentious issues that arise. For example, currently the government for political purposes always cite Maldives as a 100 percent Islamic country although every rational human being knows that any human society can never be 100 percent in anything because no humans can ever think alike or believe in the same thing, or even when believing in the same thing, believe from the same angle… 

It’s tragic that power-hungry people seek homogeneity and conformity in ideology and practice, having an inexplicable fear and insecurity in allowing for diversity, in allowing for people to grow up intellectually and develop as responsible adults for diversity to act as a catalyst to main harmony in society. Rather, the groups of people who have vested interests in the nation’s power and wealth, aim to keep Maldivians firmly under their psychological control by creating fear that if Maldivians deviated to other sects or religions there will be violence.

Which, when you think about it, is treating the average Maldivian as stupid, and kind of saying that the average Maldivian, rather than listen to the peaceful message of the Quran, would rather for no reason go and kill his neighbor just because the neighbor had left Islam. Is the average Maldivian really violent? Aren’t you personally insulted when what the “100-percent” supporters actually mean is that the average Maldivian, including yourself, is stupid and violent, and will go off on a killing spree, hunting down all neighbors who don’t believe in Islam? Come on. 

Real Muslim Maldivians haven’t forgotten the Quran’s message that “there’s no compulsion in religion” and therefore we are not going to kill another Maldivian just because he leaves Islam. It is for Allah to judge, not us weak humans. The only conclusion I can come to, therefore, is that if any Maldivian is against freedom of religion, then it is only because he has a dark desire to have psychological control over other people.

Free counters!
 
Proudly Supported by Rainbow Maldives | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | fantastic sams coupons